Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

300 F.2d 162

Docket No. 13867.

Sims v. Willingham

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted on Briefs March 6, 1962. Decided March 15, 1962.

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-03-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on 24 Ill. 2d 437 - John v. Tribune Company · United States ex rel. Leguillou v. Davis · Brewer v. Hearst Pub. Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1962-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2013

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

100196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Ralph L. Sims, appellant-pro se.

Bernard J. Brown, U.S. Atty., Harry A. Nagle, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Scranton, Pa., for appellee.

Before STALEY, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant is a prisoner who has been committed to the United States Penitentiary at Lewisburg, Pennsylvania, to serve a sentence imposed by the District Court for the District of Columbia. Invoking the provisions of Section 2255 of Title 28, United States Code, he first made an unsuccessful collateral attack on his conviction in the District Court for the District of Columbia. Thereafter, in the present proceeding, he asked the District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, the District in which he is incarcerated, to entertain a petition for habeas corpus under Section 2241 of Title 28, United States Code, claiming again that his District of Columbia conviction involved a violation of constitutional rights.

¶2

The court below properly ruled that it had no jurisdiction in the premises because Congress has made the procedure of petition in the sentencing court under Section 2255, a prisoner's exclusive remedy in such a case as this. United States ex rel. Leguillou v. Davis, 3d Cir. 1954, 212 F.2d 681; Williams v. United States, 10th Cir. 1960, 283 F.2d 59.

¶3

The judgment will be affirmed.

/300/f2d/162 · .json · Public domain