Brown v. Addressograph-Multigraph Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
300 F.2d 280 · 1962
Citation profile
14 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently October 1995
14 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Comstock v. General Motors Corp. · Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Green · Clarence D. Gerhart v. Henry Disston and Sons, Inc. v. H. K. Porter Company, Inc., and H. K. Porter Company, Inc. Of Pittsburgh. K. Knudtson v. Henry Disston and Sons, Inc. v. H. K. Porter Company, Inc., and H. K. Porter Company, Inc. Of Pittsburgh · Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Freeman · Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. Whiteley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a litigant is entitled to have a trial judge tell the jury of his claims and theory of law, if stated succinctly and without argument.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.