Hooks v. Fahey’s Empirical Analysis
300 F.2d 383 · 1961
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently September 1987 · most notably United States v. Judson (1963), Bouschor v. United States (1963)
29 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 26 U.S.C. § 7604
Relies on Rogers v. United States · Blau v. United States · Brody v. United States · Sale v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The findings and conclusions made by Judge Shelbourne [District Court Judge] reflect that he found as a fact the work papers in the file belong to Mr. Powell [the accountant], that possession of these papers by Mr. Fahey [the taxpayer] was temporary and this temporary possession was terminated by the letter of June 17, 1960.” 300 F.2d at 385 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“There is no constitutional privilege for incriminating evidence in the possession of another person, even though the information supporting the evidence was obtained from the accused and regardless of whether such evidence tends to incriminate the other person.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sheets v. Hathcock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.