Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 F.2d 414 - Lloyd Eldon Miller, Jr. v. Frank J. Pate

Lloyd Eldon Miller, Jr. v. Frank J. Pate’s Empirical Analysis

300 F.2d 414 · 1962

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
August 1996
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1996

11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

601962197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brown v. Allen · Snyder v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Culombe v. Connecticut · Rogers v. Richmond · Stein v. People of State of New York Wissner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is in view of this lack of petitioner's credibility that we now consider his testimony to support his claim of coercion. From our own examination of the abstract of the entire state trial record submitted by petitioner to the district court, we are completely convinced that petitioner's confession was in no way a result of coercion. In this court the question of whether established primary facts underlying this confession prove that it was coerced or voluntary cannot rest on the decision of the Illinois Supreme Court. The responsibility of answering the question now rests upon us. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. United States ex rel. Miller v. Pate
  2. “communication between the judge and the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Cramer v. Fahner

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.