Haddad v. Border Express, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
300 F.2d 885 · 1962
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2005
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thibeault v. Poole · 181 F. Supp. 298 - Eisel v. Columbia Packing Company · Wishnewsky v. Town of Saugus · Parker v. Gordon · Browne v. Moran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The administrator having participated in the trial and litigated the same issues, these findings are res judicata against him to the extent that they are applicable. They are fully applicable. * -» *»”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.