United States v. Coriaty’s Empirical Analysis
300 F.3d 244 · 2002
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably United States v. Salmonese (2003), United States v. Boccagna (2006)
23 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · Stirone v. United States · Turner v. United States · Griffin v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he statutory focus [of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is] on the victim’s loss and upon making victims whole....”). 15 . More specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (c) was enacted on September 13, 1994. See Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-322, sec. 40113 (b)(1), § (f), 108 Stat. 1796 , 1910 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2259 [c]). Subsequently, 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(2) was amended on April 24, 1996, so that the definition of "victim” no longer meant merely "a person directly harmed as a result of the commission of an offense” but "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of an offense.” See Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, sec. 205(a)(1)(F), § (a)(2), 110 Stat. 1214 , 1230 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3663 [a][2]). Similarly, 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(2) was amended on April 24, 1996, so that the definition of "victim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he statutory focus [of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is] on the victim’s loss and upon making victims whole....”). 15 . More specifically, 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (c) was enacted on September 13, 1994. See Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, Pub.L. No. 103-322, sec. 40113 (b)(1), § (f), 108 Stat. 1796 , 1910 (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 2259 [c]). Subsequently, 18 U.S.C. § 3663 (a)(2) was amended on April 24, 1996, so that the definition of”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.