Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 F.3d 985 - United States v. Koons

United States v. Koons’s Empirical Analysis

300 F.3d 985 · 2002

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
2
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently January 2023 · most notably United States v. Mashek (2005), United States v. Lee (2004)

35 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

480200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 860 (§ 419 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[The defendant] claims the issuing magistrate abandoned the role of a judge. That can happen if a magistrate fails to read a warrant application or affidavit, relies on an officer’s oral testimony rather than the written affidavit, approves a warrant without specifics as to the objects of the search, fails to comply with legal formalities such as required signatures, or otherwise acts contrary to law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A search is supported by probable cause if facts are shown making it likely that evidence of a crime will be found in the place to be searched.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.