Gordon v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Arizona v. California · eBay Inc. v. MERCEXCHANGE, LL · Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes · 133 S. Ct. 1426 - Comcast Corp. v. Behrend
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“• Defendants shall immediately cease and desist subjecting all current and future class members—that is, aliens not detained within forty-eight hours of release from the relevant prior non-DHS custody (or if a weekend or holiday intervenes, within no more than five days)—to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (c). • Defendants shall immediately determine the custody of every current class ' member under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (a) and timely provide a bond hearing to every class member that seeks a redetermination of his or her custody by an Immigration Judge pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19 & 1236.1(d). • Defendants shall determine the custody of every future class member under 8 U.S.C. [§] 1226(a) and provide a bond hearing to every class member that seeks a redetermination of his or her custody by an Immigration Judge pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19 & 1236.1(d).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Lynch“all aliens who are or will be detained in Massachusetts under 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (c), whom the government alleges to be subject to a ground of removability as described in 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (c)(l)(A)-(D), and who were not taken into immigration custody within forty-eight hours (or, if a weekend or holiday intervenes, within no more than five days) of release from the relevant predicate custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Gordon v. Lynch
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.