Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 F. Supp. 688 - Murray v. Vaughn

300 F. Supp. 688 - Murray v. Vaughn’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 1999 · most notably Manual De J. Gomez v. Jerry v. Wilson, Chief of Police (1973), Tatum v. Laird (1971)

20 federal appellate · 16 district · 1 state decisions

4001969197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 22 U.S.C. § 2503 · 22 U.S.C. § 2504 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 28 U.S.C. § 2283 · 50 U.S.C. § 3806 · 50 U.S.C. § 3809 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811

Relies on New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Gault · Bell v. Hood · United States v. O'Brien

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under this theory it is alleged that Murray’s intention to state his mind on Peace Corps policy and on United States foreign policy became known to Peace Corps personnel who determined to and did, in fact, bring about his removal from the Peace Corps and who, also, informed his local Selective Service System agency of his termination and either hinted or indicated directly that Murray should be reclassified and .that the local board then did reclassify Murray I-A.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““ * * * had Murray continued in Peace Corps service his local board either would not have reclassified him I-A or would have entertained and granted a pro forma request by him to be returned to II-A status. Hence, it is concluded, 'but for’ the action of the Peace Corps, Murray would have retained his II-A status, would have passed his twenty-sixth birthday, and would not have been ordered to report for induction.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]here are many rights and immunities secured by the Constitution, of which freedom of speech and assembly are conspicuous examples, which are not capable of money valuation, and in many instances, like the present, no suit in equity could be maintained for their protection if proof of the jurisdictional amount were prerequisite.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.