Lupoe v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
99
cited by 99 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited
99 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Williams v. Taylor · Kimmelman v. Morrison · United States v. Abel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must point to an error that was not affirmatively waived, the error must have been clear and not open to reasonable dispute, the error must have affected his substantial rights, and the error must have seriously affected the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kemp v. State · Soto v. State“do more than raise the possibility that a separate trial would give him a better chance of acquittal. He must make a clear showing that a joint trial would lead to prejudice and a consequent denial of due process.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Nguyen v. State · Smith v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.