Barnett v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Liteky et al United States · Pyatt v. State · Kennebrew v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[J]udicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“whether, as an objective matter, the average judge in his position is likely to be neutral, or whether there is an unconstitutional potential for bias.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.