Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 Ga. App. 837 - Bergen v. State

300 Ga. App. 837 - Bergen v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Harvey v. Meadows · 259 Ga. App. 375 - Gardner v. State · 290 Ga. App. 37 - Gamble v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a condition of a probated or suspended sentence [,] which: (1) [i]s expressly imposed as part of the sentence in addition to general conditions of probation and court ordered fines and fees; and (2) [i]s identified in writing in the sentence as a condition the violation of which authorizes the court to revoke the probation or suspension and require the defendant to serve up to the balance of the sentence in confinement. 2”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “fails to distinguish between general and special conditions of probation and fails to specify that a possible consequence of violating a special condition is the revocation of a probationer’s entire probation. It follows that the trial court erred when it revoked the entirety of [Sheppard’s] probation. Revocation of more than two years of [Sheppard’s] probation was prohibited, and we must remand this case for resentencing in accord with statutory authority. 5”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[subsection] (c) provides for the revocation of up to two years of probation for the violation of any general provision; subsection (d) authorizes the revocation of the balance of probation if the defendant is shown to have committed a felony, and subsection (e) provides for revocation of the balance if the defendant is shown to have violated a special condition. 1”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.