Bly v. Bly’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
February 1945
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chubb v. Chubb · Tyson v. Tyson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““While we are not restricted by the findings of the circuit court, a divorce case on appeal being heard dé tioao, especial consideration is given to such findings, so largely based upon the credibility of the witnesses, and the revieAving court ought not to reverse the determination of the trial court in such a ease, unless convinced that it must haAe reached a different conclusion had it occupied the position of the loAver court, under like circumstances. ’ ’”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robbins v. Robbins““We are mindful that the parties should come into equity with clean hands and, like the trial judge, we are not impressed by some of the testimony. However, we cannot say that we must have reached a different conclusion if we had had the opportunity to see and hear the witnesses.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hall v. Hall““In the instant case we find no reason for disturbing the determination of the trial judge either as to which party should have the decree of divorce or the award of alimony and property settlement.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ferguson v. Ferguson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.