Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 Minn. 99 - State v. White

State v. White’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
August 2016
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably White v. State (1976), Ture v. State (1984)

33 state decisions

15019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Johnson · State v. Reiland · Kistner v. United States · City of St. Paul v. Whidby · Reisner v. Board of Trustees of the Fire Retirement System

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]f a person’s conduct constitutes more than one offense under the laws of this state, he may be punished for only one of the offenses and a conviction or acquittal of any one of them is a bar to prosecution for any other of them. All the offenses, if prosecuted, shall be included in one prosecution which shall be stated in separate counts.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is uncontested that defendant did not object to his prosecution in district court on the felony charge. He appeared in district court twice between his arrest 'and his sentencing. In the presence of counsel he pleaded guilty. He seeks to attack the judgment of the trial court by raising § 609.035 for the first time on appeal. In so far as double punishment is concerned, the municipal court ordered a suspended 10-day sentence. Defendant can hardly claim multiple punishment. Nevertheless, we hold that the prohibition against double punishment cannot be waived, and thus the 10-day sentence imposed for the misdemeanor must be vacated and set aside.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.