Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 N.C. 71 - State v. Smith

State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

1,005
cited by 1,005 later decisions
2
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1,002 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,005 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Earnhardt (1982), State v. Bullard (1984)

3 federal appellate · 1,002 state decisions

32801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · State v. Fulcher · Thompson v. Wake County Board of Education · State v. Atkinson · State v. Witherspoon

Cited together with State v. Powell · State v. Fritsch · 186 N.C. App. 57 - State v. Smith · State v. Earnhardt · State v. Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,005 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.”
    126 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Upon defendant's motion for dismissal, the question for the Court is whether there is substantial evidence (1) of each essential element of the offense charged, or of a lesser offense included therein, and (2) of defendant's being the perpetrator of such offense. If so, the motion is properly denied.”
    98 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]here there is no doubt that a defendant is fully aware of the charge against him, or is in no way prejudiced by the omission of a formal arraignment, it is not reversible error for the trial court to fail to conduct a formal arraignment proceeding.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.