Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 N.C. 83 - Jolly v. Wright

Jolly v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

138
cited by 138 later decisions
6
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 138 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc. (1990), State v. Perry (1982)

9 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

84019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gideon v. Wainwright · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Argersinger v. Hamlin · Shillitani v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 138 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “due process does not require that counsel be automatically appointed for indigents in such cases; rather, the minimum requirements of due process are satisfied by evaluating the necessity of counsel on a case-by-case basis. . . . [D]ue process requires appointment of counsel for indigents in nonsupport civil contempt proceedings only in those cases where assistance of counsel is necessary for an adequate presentation of the merits, or to otherwise ensure fundamental fairness.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'[A] statute must be construed, if possible, so as to give effect to every provision, it being presumed that the Legislature did not intend any of the statute's provisions to be surplusage.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[f]ailure to comply with an order of the court,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.