Intili v. DiGiorgio’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A cause of action with respect to a fraudulent transfer or obligation under this article is extinguished unless action is brought: a. Under subsection a. of [N.J.S.A] 25:2-25, within four years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred or, if later, within one year after the transfer or obligation was or could reasonably have been discovered, by the claimant; b. Under subsection b. of [N.J.SA] 25:2-25 or subsection a. of [NASA] 25:2-27, within four years after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred; or c. Under subsection b. of [N.J.S.A] 25:2-27, within one year after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred. [N.J.SA 25:2-31 (emphasis added).]”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. First Union National Bank v. Gibbons (In Re Princeton-New York Investors, Inc.) · SASCO 1997 NI, LLC v. Zudkewich

2. “A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor, whether the creditor’s claim arose before or after the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred, if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation: a. With actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud any creditor of the debtor; or b. Without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation, and the debtor: (1) Was engaged or was about to engage in a business or a transaction for which the remaining assets of the debtor were unreasonably small in relation to the business or transaction; or (2) Intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that the debtor would incur, debts beyond the debtor’s ability to pay as they become due. [N.J.S.A. 25:2-25 (1997).] 18”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Those Parties Listed on Exhibit a (In Re G-I Holdings, Inc.)

3. “Legislature's purpose would be frustrated if N.J.S.A. [§] 25:2-31's time limitations were relaxed.” See Defendant’s Brief at 10 (italics omitted). As the District Court noted, however, "Intili did not implicate the [Bankruptcy] Code.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Gibbons v. First Fidelity Bank, N.A. (In re Princeton-New York Investors, Inc.)