Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

300 Pa. Super. 259

Ganzy v. Provan

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 4, 1982

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · decided 1982-06-04

Relies on Mattos v. Thompson · Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc. · 286 Pa. Super. 510 - Smith v. Barclay

Decided 1982-06-04

PER CURIAM:

¶1This is an appeal from an order in which the lower court transferred the case to the Arbitration Panels for Health Care on the ground that the Arbitration Panels had exclusive original jurisdiction. In light of our Supreme Court’s decision in Mattos v. Thompson, 491 Pa. 385, 421 A.2d 190 (1980), the order must be reversed, and the case remanded for trial. Spruk v. United Laboratories of Cleveland, 290 Pa.Super.Ct. 74, 434 A.2d 136 (1981); Ehritz v. Capriotti, 288 Pa.Super.Ct. 265, 431 A.2d 1040 (1981); Gallagher v. Caliguiri, 287 Pa.Super.Ct. 250, 429 A.2d 1195 (1981); Smith v. Barclay, 286 Pa.Super.Ct. 510, 429 A.2d 438 (1981); see Firich v. American Cystoscope Makers, Inc., 635 F.2d 259, 261 (3rd Cir. 1980).

¶2Order reversed, and case remanded for trial.

/300/pasuper/259 · .json · Public domain