Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

300 S.C. 268

State v. Riddle

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 2, 1990

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1990-01-02

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1994

1 state decisions

Applies SC 17 § 17-19-100

Relies on State v. Lyle

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1990-01-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Chandler, Justice:

¶1Appellant, Bruce Eugene Riddle (Riddle), contends the Circuit Court erred in permitting an amendment to his indictment during the course of trial. We agree and reverse.

¶2Riddle was indicted for assault with intent to commit third-degree criminal sexual conduct. At the close of evidence, the indictment was amended to charge assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. The sole issue we address is whether the amendment was proper.

¶3S. C. Code Ann. § 17-19-100 (1976) permits amendment of an indictment provided the nature of the offense charged is not changed. Here, the amendment increases the lesser charge of assault with intent to commit third degree criminal sexual conduct to the greater charge of assault with intent to commit first degree criminal sexual conduct. Punishment for third degree may not exceed ten years, while first degree is punishable by up to thirty years.

¶4The amendment clearly exceeded the terms of the statute.

¶5Appellant’s second issue is affirmed pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 23; State v. Lyle, 125 S. C. 406, 118 S. E. 803 (1923).

¶6Reversed and remanded.

Gregory, C. J., and Harwell, Finney and Toal, JJ., concur.
/300/sc/268 · .json · Public domain