Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 So. 2d 788 - Dyer v. State

300 So. 2d 788 - Dyer v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently January 2016

16 state decisions

6019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 227 So. 2d 454 - Ford v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A trial judge is not charged with knowledge of every paper filed with the court clerk. It is not the duty of the judge, ex mero motu, to search out and bring up such matters. On the other hand, the affirmative duty rests upon a party filing a motion to follow up this action by bringing it to the attention of the judge and by requesting a hearing upon it.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]llegations of fact in a motion for a new trial must be supported by proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.