Atkins v. Womble’s Empirical Analysis
1957
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2014
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wright v. Wright · London Terrace, Inc. v. McAlister · Logan v. Thomason · Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State · Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A valid settlement agreement and a release, until set aside or canceled, are a complete bar to any later action based on matters included in the settlement agreement and covered by the release. Associated Employers Lloyds v. Howard, 156 Tex. 277 , 294 S.W.2d 706 ; Hart v. Traders & General Ins. Co., 144 Tex. 146 , 189 S.W.2d 493 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Swart v. Samples · Mapp v. Snitker““Plaintiff here and now respectfully prays that the [release] contract entered into by and between the plaintiff and defendants, copy of which is attached as Exhibit “A”, be declared a nullity and void insofar as it constitutes a ‘full, complete and final settlement of any and all claims of every kind and character’ that Nettie Edna Womble had against the Estate of C. T. Tatum, and insofar as the said contract constituted a compromise of any claims Nettie Edna Womble had against the Estate of C. T. Tatum and insofar as said contract released said estate from the claims that Nettie Edna Womble had against the Estate of C. T. Tatum, and insofar as the contract constitutes a ‘full release of the Estate of C. T. Tatum, deceased, the Executors and their successors in office and the residuary beneficiaries’ and that all costs be taxed against the defendants and that plaintiff have such other and further relief to which she may be entitled.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Womble v. Atkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.