Burton v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 2018
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Huddleston v. United States · Lockhart v. Nelson · Commonwealth v. Benham · Commonwealth v. English
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is disqualified to testify as a witness if the trial court determines that he: (1) Lacked the capacity to perceive accurately the matters about which he proposes to testify; (2) Lacks the capacity to recollect facts; (3) Lacks the capacity to express himself so as to be understood, either directly or through an interpreter; or (4) Lacks the capacity to understand the obligation of a witness to tell the truth.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Swan v. Commonwealth“the same evidence considered by the trial court, rightfully or wrongfully.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“jury is presumed to follow the trial court's admonition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.