Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 300 SW3D 35 - In Re Jacobs

In Re Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 9 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Probate Court)

Relationships

Relies on BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · Walker v. Packer · Transportation Insurance Co. v. Moriel · In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Burk Royalty Co. v. Walls

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A) which when viewed objectively from the standpoint of the actor at the time of its occurrence involves an extreme degree of risk, considering the probability and magnitude of the potential harm to others; and (B) of which the actor has actual, subjective awareness of the risk involved, but nevertheless proceeds with conscious indifference to the rights, safety, or welfare of others.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a defendant could no longer be exposed to punitive damages because of another person's criminal act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.