Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 A2D 509 - Pittman v. State

Pittman v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

56
cited by 56 later decisions
24
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Barnes (1974), 46 Ill. App. 3d 195 - People v. Daily (1977)

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 49 state decisions — followed in 24 states

22019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Costello v. United States · 37 Misc. 2d 386 - People v. Esposito · 5 Md. App. 652 - King v. State · 90 N.J. Super. 464 - State v. Mason · State v. Lippolis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]his agreement shall be liberally construed so as to effectuate its purposes.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “not only misreads the purpose [of the IAD], but effectively emasculates it as well. The Legislature enacted no specific requirement that a prisoner, for whose benefit the IAD was enacted, be apprised of the technical aspects of the law. Indeed, the Legislature has placed one, and only one burden on the prisoner, that is, to ask the prison official who has custody over him to prepare and send the forms to the jurisdiction from which a detainer is lodged against him.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The burden of compliance with the procedural requirements of the IAD rests upon the party states and their agents; the prisoner, who is to benefit from this statute, is not to be held accountable for official administrative errors which deprive him of that benefit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.