Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 ARK 172 - Bryant v. Eifling

Bryant v. Eifling’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 1992
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gardner v. State · J. Paul Smith Co. v. Tipton · Simmons v. Frazier · Martin v. Blackmon · Thompson v. AAA Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mistrial is a drastic remedy that is appropriate only if justice cannot be served by continuation of the trial and when it is obvious that the prejudice cannot be removed by any other means.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “This court has held that assumption of risk by a party will not bar recovery but will be considered when assessing fault.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.