Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.2d 105 - D'Agosta v. Royal Netherlands Steamship Co.

D'Agosta v. Royal Netherlands Steamship Co.’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.2d 105 · 1962

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
September 1986
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently September 1986 · most notably Sergio Degioia v. United States Lines Company, and Third-Party v. American Stevedores, Inc., and Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Third-Party (1962), Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co. (1986)

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

150196219701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Stevedores, Inc. v. Porello · Archawski v. Hanioti · Debt v. Wyer · Dupont De Nemours Co v. John Vance et al. · Richfield Oil Corp. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree with appellant that an action on an implied warranty cannot be maintained in this case because of the existence of the express indemnity provision.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.