Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.2d 284 - Gilbertson v. De Long

Gilbertson v. De Long’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.2d 284 · 1962

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 11 Wis. 2d 415 - Klatt v. Zera · Connell v. Luck · Klas v. Fenske · Archer v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad · Employers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Haucke

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`The language of the statute is clear and unambiguous. It attaches liability to the parent sponsor for any negligence in the operation of an automobile by his or her child, and under its provisions a parent who signed an application for an instruction permit of a child under eighteen years of age is made liable for the negligent or unlawful conduct of such minor in operating a motor vehicle upon the highways. [Citation omitted.] "`The statute contains no exception. It makes no provision for any exemption for injuries or damages sustained by the sponsor parent.'" 301 F.2d at 285 . The court in Gilbertson also noted that the legislature had not prescribed that the imputed negligence under the statute be applied in the same manner as in a principal-agency relationship. 301 F.2d at 285 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “barring claims of a sponsor against a negligent minor might encourage a greater degree of supervision over the operation of a vehicle in which the sponsor was a passenger.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.