Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.2d 565 - Greene v. Weatherington

Greene v. Weatherington’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.2d 565 · 1962

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 2012

9 federal appellate · 5 district · 5 state decisions

140196219701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Braunfeld v. Gibbons · Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Stewart v. Ramsay · Lamb v. Schmitt · Netograph Manufacturing Co. v. . Scrugham

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “proceeds upon the ground that the due administration of justice requires that a court shall not permit interference with the progress of a cause pending before it, by the service of process in other suits, which would prevent, or the fear of which might tend to discourage, the voluntary attendance of those whose presence is necessary or convenient to the judicial administration in the pending litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.