Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.3d 1109 - Singh v. Ashcroft

Singh v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.3d 1109 · 2002

Citation profile

196
cited by 196 later decisions
November 2021
most recently cited

26 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 196 later decisions — most recently November 2021 · most notably Malhi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service (2003), Shrestha v. Holder (2010)

26 federal appellate ·

1650200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Ghaly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Varsha Tushar Shah v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Naseem Salman al-Harbi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 196 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “must go to the heart of [the] asylum claim.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he BIA must have a legitimate articulable basis to question the petitioner's credibility, and must offer a specific, cogent reason for any stated disbelief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only if the evidence that the petitioner presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.