United States v. Rollins’s Empirical Analysis
301 F.3d 511 · 2002
Citation profile
36 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably United States v. Souffront (2003), United States v. Leahy (2006)
36 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 50 U.S.C. § 1601 (National Emergencies Act)
Relies on United States v. Olano · Zafiro v. United States · United States v. Moya-Gomez · United States v. Taglia · United States v. Beasley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“of the same or similar character, or are based on the same act or transaction, or are connected with or constitute parts of a common scheme or plan.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“prejudice requiring severance is not shown if evidence on the severed counts would be admissible in the trial of the remaining counts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.