United States v. Owens’s Empirical Analysis
301 F.3d 521 · 2002
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently November 2023 · most notably United States v. Stephens (2005), United States v. Van Allen (2008)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1343
Relies on United States v. Baskes · United States v. Paneras · United States v. Taylor · United States v. Richard · United States v. Emelio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`if the record is devoid of evidence pointing to guilt, or if the evidence on a key element of the offense was so tenuous that a conviction would be shocking.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“only if his conviction[ ] amount[s] to a manifest miscarriage of justice,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“to allow a rational trier of fact to find all of the essential elements of an offense beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.