Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.3d 839 - Brooks v. Walls

Brooks v. Walls’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.3d 839 · 2002

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
September 2009
most recently cited

15 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Ake v. Oklahoma · Harris v. Reed · Christopher Artuz Superintendent Green Haven Correctional Facility v. Tony Bruce Bennett · Carey Warden v. Saffold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Saffold tells us (ending any ambiguity left by Artuz) that to be `properly filed' an application for collateral review in state court must satisfy the state's timeliness requirements.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “petitions untimely under state rules nonetheless may be deemed 'properly filed.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “both aspects of a dual-ground decision (substance and procedure) must be respected, so that an untimely petition is not `properly filed' even if the court also addresses the merits....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.