Collier v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
301 F.3d 843 · 2002
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2022
11 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Williams v. Taylor · Giglio v. United States · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · Wright v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“could have fully explored this topic in cross-examination of [the witness] at trialbut did not do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“general and hopeful expectation of leniency is not enough to create an agreement or an understanding”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Shabazz v. Artuz“failed to disclose known evidence before it was too late for [them] to make use of the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.