Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 F.3d 985 - Conservation Force, Inc. v. Manning

Conservation Force, Inc. v. Manning’s Empirical Analysis

301 F.3d 985 · 2002

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
May 2015
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Gibbons v. Ogden · Wickard v. Filburn · Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady · Northeastern Florida Chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America v. City of Jacksonville

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has a substantial effect' on interstate commerce such that Congress could regulate the activity.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “struggled (to put it nicely) to develop a set of rules by which we may preserve a national market without needlessly intruding upon the States' police powers, each exercise of which no doubt has some effect on the commerce of the Nation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “if the State regulates evenhandedly, the regulation is valid unless the plaintiff can show that it imposes a burden on interstate commerce clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.