Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 FSUPP3D 227 - Pullman Arms Inc. v. Healey

Pullman Arms Inc. v. Healey’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
April 2025
most recently cited

3 district ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act)

Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. Halderman · Bennett v. Spear · MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. · Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “clarity in regulation is essential to the protection afforded by the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.