Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 FSUPP3D 478 - Hite v. Manor Junior Coll.

Hite v. Manor Junior Coll.’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton · Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the Supreme Court has made clear that, even where the statute of limitations prevents a plaintiff from asserting a claim based on a discrete discriminatory act, the statute does not 'bar an employee from using the prior act[ ] as background evidence in support of a timely claim.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.