Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 GA 137 - Jackson v. State

Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Eubanks · Smith v. Hardrick · Palmer v. State · Borders v. State · Kimbrough v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) recite the language of the statute that sets out all the elements of the offense charged, or (2) allege the facts necessary to establish violation of a criminal statute.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “recite[s] a sufficient portion of the statute to set out all the elements of the offense for which [Budhani] was tried and convicted.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “not that the charge in an indictment is fatally defective and incapable of supporting a conviction (as would be asserted by general demurrer), but rather that the charge is imperfect as to form or that the accused is entitled to more information.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.