Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 GA 161 - Veal v. State

Veal v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Tietjen v. Meldrim · White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prejudice to [Appellant's] ability to ... assert his arguments on appeal”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Even assuming that the first three Barker factors-length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the defendant's assertion of his right-weigh in favor of [Appellant], his due process claim nevertheless fails because [Appellant] failed to show that he was prejudiced by the delay.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “[W]e have repeatedly found that the failure to make [a showing of prejudice] in an appellate delay claim [is] fatal to the claim, even when the other three factors weigh in the appellant's favor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.