Veal v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
states following
February 2024
most recently cited
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Barker v. Wingo · Tietjen v. Meldrim · White v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“prejudice to [Appellant's] ability to ... assert his arguments on appeal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Even assuming that the first three Barker factors-length of the delay, the reason for the delay, and the defendant's assertion of his right-weigh in favor of [Appellant], his due process claim nevertheless fails because [Appellant] failed to show that he was prejudiced by the delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. De La Cruz v. State“[W]e have repeatedly found that the failure to make [a showing of prejudice] in an appellate delay claim [is] fatal to the claim, even when the other three factors weigh in the appellant's favor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Norman v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.