Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 GA 37 - Sullivan v. State

Sullivan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · United States v. Cronic · Malcolm v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we evaluate only the effects of matters determined to be error, not the cumulative effect of non-errors. As explained above, [Cobb] has failed to show that counsel was professionally deficient in [failing to call an eyewitness expert]. Assuming, without deciding, that the failure to [call inmate Keith Dixon] was deficient, [Cobb] has not shown Strickland prejudice from [this omission]. Therefore, his cumulative effect assertion has no merit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “To determine whether one crime is included in another, and therefore merges as a matter of fact, the court must assess whether conviction for one of the offenses is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the other crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A defendant who contends a strategic decision constitutes deficient performance must show that no competent attorney, under similar circumstances, would have made it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.