Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 Ga. App. 315 - State v. Moses

301 Ga. App. 315 - State v. Moses’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Ruffin v. State · Brannen v. State · Williams v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No one of these factors, standing alone, is either a necessary or sufficient condition to a finding of a deprivation of the right to a speedy trial. Rather, they are related factors and must be considered together with such other circumstances as may be relevant. Thus, the second stage of the constitutional speedy trial analysis requires courts to engage in a difficult and sensitive balancing process and necessarily compels them to approach speedy trial cases on an ad hoc basis.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.