Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 Ga. App. 4 - Davis v. Overall

301 Ga. App. 4 - Davis v. Overall’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 226 Ga. App. 459 - Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · Williams v. Harris · Tyler v. Lincoln · Swift v. Broyles · 243 Ga. App. 526 - Baumann v. Snider

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). This [c]ourt applies a de novo standard of review to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment and we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[wjhen a deprivation of use and enjoyment [of property] has occurred, a plaintiff may recover both nominal damages and whatever the jury determines the defendant ought to pay, in view of the discomfort and annoyance to which the plaintiff and his family have been subjected by the [defendant’s actions].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.