Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 Mich. 551 - Valenti v. Mayer

Valenti v. Mayer’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
7
states following
January 1956
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gile v. Hudnutt · Sadjak v. Parker-Wolverine Co. · People v. Winney · Wojtaszek v. Department of Street Railways

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Primarily plaintiff’s right- to recover requires proof that there was negligence on the part of Bareis (defendant) which was the sole or at least a contributing proximate cause of the accident. The question of contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff is not involved on this appeal; and contributory negligence of the driver of plaintiff’s car cannot be imputed to plaintiff who was a minor. The jury found Bareis was not guilty of negligence which caused or contributed as a cause of the collision accident.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.