Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 N.C. 243 - State v. Bright

State v. Bright’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

105
cited by 105 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 105 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Ahearn (1983), State v. Rogers (1986)

2 federal appellate · 103 state decisions

5601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Neil v. Biggers · Beck v. State of Ohio · Harrington v. California · Fahy v. Connecticut

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 105 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The existence of probable cause depends upon 'whether at that moment the facts and circumstances within [the officers'] knowledge and of which they had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the [suspect] had committed or was committing an offense.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court must consider the evidence `in the light most favorable to the State,' and the State is entitled to every reasonable inference to be drawn from it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “A sentence within the statutory limit will be presumed regular and valid. However, such a presumption is not conclusive. If the record discloses that the court considered irrelevant and improper matter in determining the severity of the sentence, the presumption of regularity is overcome, and the sentence is in violation of defendant’s rights.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.