Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 NJSUPER 158 - State v. Pena

State v. Pena’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2012
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2012

6 state decisions

20199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Butler · State v. Mitchell · State v. Davis · State v. Sainz · State v. Barboza

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[p]ossession ... signifies `a knowing, intentional control of a designated thing, accompanied by a knowledge of its character.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.