Velop, Inc. v. Kaplan’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably Fertile v. St. Michael's Medical Center (2001), Mylan Inc. v. Smithkline Beecham Corp. (2013)
2 federal appellate · 8 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp. · Dolson v. Anastasia · Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine Company · Nappe v. Anschelewitz, Barr, Ansell & Bonello · Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The appropriate measure of damages for injury done to land is a complex subject”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“in a great variety of ways depending upon the evidence in the particular case.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Ibid. [T]he general rule with respect to building contracts is that the disappointed owner may recover the costs of completing the promised performance or making necessary repairs, unless under the facts it is impossible to do so or the costs of completion or repairs would constitute unreasonable economic waste, in which event reference would be made to the difference in value formula. [ Id. at 255 , 168 A. 2d 33 .] Whether the cost of repair or diminution in value is the measure of damages”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.