Slater v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
4
states following
December 1988
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bates v. State Bar · United States v. Iaconetti · State v. Altergott · United States v. Iaconetti · Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the declarant must testify at the trial and be subject to cross-examination concerning the statement. Second, the statement must be consistent with the declarant’s prior testimony. Finally, the statement must be offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of a recent fabrication or improper influence or motive.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.