Ryan v. Ryan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “A court which has jurisdiction under this chapter to make an initial or modification decree may decline to exercise its jurisdiction any time before making a decree if it finds that it is an inconvenient forum to make a custody determination under the circumstances of the case and that a court of another state is a more appropriate forum. ⅜ ⅜ * * * * In determining if it is an inconvenient forum, the court shall consider if it is in the interest of the child that another state assume jurisdiction. For this purpose it may take into account the following factors, including: 1) If another state is or recently was the child’s home state; 2) If another state has a closer connection with the child and his family or with the child and one or more of the contestants; 3) If substantial evidence concerning the child’s present or future care, protection, training, and personal relationships is more readily available in another state; 4) If the parties have agreed on another forum which is no less appropriate.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Lustig v. Lustig