Pierson v. Multnomah County’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the inherent conflict between persons who are wrongfully arrested and officers who are charged with the duty to arrest persons under a warrant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.