Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 Pa. Super. 1 - Commonwealth v. Todaro

301 Pa. Super. 1 - Commonwealth v. Todaro’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
August 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2003

2 federal appellate · 20 state decisions

120198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Graves · Commonwealth v. Woodward · Commonwealth v. Tolassi · Commonwealth v. Tarver · Commonwealth v. Bridge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The theory of the prosecution was that the accident occurred in the southbound lane of traffic and was caused by appellant who was driving in that lane____ Our examination of the record indicates that as the lower court found, there is no evidence to support the inference that the accident was caused by the deceased or that it occurred in the northbound lane. Of course, the burden of proof is on the prosecution to show that appellant caused the accident. Appellant need not demonstrate that it occurred in another way. However, while the burden of proof is not on appellant, he still cannot introduce evidence which does not help to prove a desired inference. Evidence of blood alcohol, alone, does not support any inference as to the cause of the accident. It was not relevant to any issue before the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.