Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 301 S.C. 181 - State v. Major

State v. Major’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

43
cited by 43 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 43 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably State v. Taylor (1998), State v. McKnight (2003)

5 federal appellate · 38 state decisions

240199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Allen · State v. Harvey · State v. LaBarge · State v. Morris · Taylor v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 43 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The drug “cocaine” has torn at the very fabric of our nation. Families have been ripped apart, minds have been ruined, and lives have been lost. It is common knowledge that the drug is highly addictive and potentially fatal. The addictive nature of the drug, combined with its expense, has caused our prisons to swell with those who have been motivated to support their drug habit through criminal acts. In some areas of the world, entire governments have been undermined by the cocaine industry.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When an accused takes the stand, he becomes subject to impeachment, like any other witness. Regardless of whether the accused offers evidence of his good character, an accused who takes the stand may be cross-examined about 'past transactions tending to affect his credibility.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “When the accused offers evidence of his good character regarding specific character traits relevant to the crime charged, the solicitor has the right to cross-examine him as to particular bad acts or conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.